Legal Opinion

Pursley v. City of Fayetteville

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1987No. 86-1332PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

In this case we examine a Fayetteville, Arkansas city ordinance that bans all pickets and demonstrations in front of residences or dwelling places. We conclude that the ordinance is unconstitutionally overbroad, in violation of the First Amendment.

I. BACKGROUND.

William F. Harrison is a Fayetteville doctor who performs abortions as part of his practice. Appellants, residents of Fayetteville and the neighboring town of Spring-dale who oppose abortion, began picketing on the public sidewalk1 fronting his house in 1985.2 Dr. Harrison’s neighbors complained about the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gray v. City of Valley Park, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Ex Parte TucciTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Acorn v. City of Tulsa, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Douglas v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Ruben W. Mangels, Administrator of the Estate of Luella R. Mangels, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API