Legal Opinion
Acorn v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 15, 1987No. 84-2606PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
The City of Tulsa regulates the use of public property through a scheme of municipal ordinances. The Association for Community Reform Now (ACORN) challenges the validity of four of these ordinances before this court. These ordinances provide, inter alia:
Tulsa, Okla., Rev. Ordinances tit. 26, § 2 (1985).
It shall be an offense for any person to perform any of the following acts within any public park or other area under the control of the Park and Recreation Board unless the doing of such act is authorized by the said Board or the Park Superintendent.(a) To give any…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Phelps v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Awad v. ZiriaxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Supreme Court of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Housing Authority of the Kaw Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. City of Ponca City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.