Legal Opinion
Habermehl v. Potter
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1998No. 97-8065PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Charles and Frances Habermehl brought this diversity tort suit in Wyoming against Michael Potter, a resident of Michigan. The district court granted Mr. Potter’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that the action had not been commenced within the applicable statute of limitation. The Habermehls appeal and we affirm.1
On October 14, 1992, Mr. Habermehl was injured while on a hunting trip near Rawlins, Wyoming, when Mr. Potter allegedly lost his balance and fell on him. The Habermehls filed the complaint in this diversity action in the federal district court in Wyoming on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lowe v. Angelo's Italian Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Seymore v. Shawver & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Jenkins v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Rosa v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Magnetek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Wallace v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Robert C. Torre Sherrill M. Polk v. James R. Brickey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jackson v. Continental Cargo-DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Atkinson Trading Co. v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.