Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Viglione v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1952No. Civ. 14807PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order directing the issuance of a writ of mandate.

Respondent, Horme Viglione, claimed that she sustained injuries on the 24th of March, 1949, while she was riding in a streetcar owned and operated by appellant, City and County of San Francisco. On the 1st day of April, 1949, she filed a verified claim against the said city and county for damages in the sum of $10,000. After negotiations between her attorneys and the claims adjuster for the city and county, a settlement was arrived at on the 14th day of March, 1950, whereby her claim was settled for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ortega v. CorderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Freeman v. Gray-Cowan, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Greiss v. State Investment & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. City of Salinas v. Luke Kow LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Granberg v. TurnhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Stephens v. Baker and BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Rollins v. HedinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Wommack v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API