Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Baker and Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1957No. Civ. 17235PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

The sole question, presented in support of this appeal is the fact that in this action for services rendered and materials furnished as a plaster contractor the complaint said nothing about plaintiff’s being a licensed contractor, though he testified that he was such at all times under the state contractor’s licensing act. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 7000-7145) and no contradictory evidence was offered.

Defendant-appellants invoke section 7031 of the code; “No person engaged in the business or acting in the capacity of a contractor, may bring or maintain any action in any court .…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Nat C. Goldstone AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Albaugh v. Moss Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Rosenthal v. Harris Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Bowline v. GriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Sheble v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Contractors Dump Truck Service, Inc. v. Gregg Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Love v. Double" AA" Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Chickering v. George R. Ogonowski Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Walker v. NitzbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Elster's Sales v. LongoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API