Legal Opinion
Betz v. Howard University Hospital
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 9, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-1578Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NA’EEM BETZ, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-1578 (JEB) v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In the latest of his innumerable pro se Telephone Consumer Protection Act lawsuits, Plaintiff Na’eem Betz alleges that Defendant Howard University Hospital violated the TCPA by calling him three or four times regarding medical care. In now seeking summary judgment, Howard rejoins that Plaintiff’s suit fails for a slew of reasons; among them, Betz’s own exhibits show that the calls were not solicitations made by an…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.