Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. United States ex rel. Haydis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:.
This appeal presents one of those “neat” questions which delight legal technicians, but have nothing to do with the merits of the case. The action is under the Miller Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270d). The pertinent provisions of the Act appear in 270b (a) and (b) and are as follows: (We have emphasized the language directly involved here.)
“(a) Every person who has furnished labor or material in the prosecution of the work provided for in such contract, in respect of which a payment bond is furnished under section 270a of this title and who has not been paid in full…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Franks v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Frank's v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Black v. Secretary Of Health And Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.