Legal Opinion
Hendricks v. Feather River Canal Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1903No. Sac. No. 1027PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
This appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll. Plaintiff brought the action to quiet his title to lot 1 of the northeast quarter and lots 2 and 3 of the southeast quarter of section 13, township 19 north, range 3 east, in Butte County, and bounded on the west and northwest by Feather River. Defendants disclaim any interest in the designated lots named, but deny that they are bounded on the west or northwest by the Feather River; aver ownership to a strip of land, being about thirty acres, lying westward of said lots and between them and the Feather River, which, it is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Schurmeier v. St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Houck v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Fuller v. DauphinIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- Forgeus v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- City of Los Angeles v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake R.R.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Drake v. Russian River Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Reno Brewing Co. v. PackardNevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Ford v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.