Drake v. Russian River Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Action to quiet title to certain land. Plaintiff and defendant claim through the same source of title, to wit, Francis Korbel, Joseph Korbel and Anton Korbel, who were the owners of the land in controversy on February 23, 1877.
Plaintiff claims a tract of one hundred and fourteen and fifty-one hundredths acres of land lying in Sonoma county, partly in section 21 and partly in section 28, township 28 north, range 10 west, Mt. Diablo base and meridian. The Russian river borders plaintiff’s land on its north, east and west sides, describing in shape a horseshoe, the arch of the bend pointing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Pike v. MunroeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
- Butler v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Hendricks v. Feather River Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Lowell v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1839
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Zimmer v. DykstraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Garbarino v. NoceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- White v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.