Vail v. Arizona
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewer
This was an application by the appellee, the Territory of Arizona, for a mandamus to compel the appellants, the supervisors of Pima County, to levy a tax to pay the interest due on certain bonds. The facts are these: In 1883 an act was passed by the territorial legislature (Laws Ariz., 1883, p. 61),' directing Pima County to exchange its bonds for those of the Arizona Narrow Gauge Railroad Company. The amount of the bonds and the conditions of exchange were specified in the act. One hundred and fifty thousand dollars of bonds were so exchanged. Pima County denied its liability on the bonds,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gunter v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Utter v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Murphy v. UtterSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Lewis v. Pima CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of Com'rs of Bayou Terre-aux-Bœufs Drainage Dist. v. BakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- North Carolina Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- State v. CardIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.