State v. Card
Idaho Supreme Court
1Concurrence
McDEVITT, Justice,
specially concurring.
INSANITY DEFENSE
An in-depth review of the legal principle of stare decisis is necessary in discussing the abolition of the insanity defense. While stare decisis is one of the first principles discussed in most law schools, its meaning and application are not universally understood. Most courts, when discussing stare decisis, use the term as one of general knowledge without need of further explanation. This has caused confusion as to its true definition and function. It is appropriate to discuss the origins of this principle and its development in Idaho…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.