Monroe v. Pape
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Frankfurter,
dissenting except insofar as the Court holds that this action cannot be maintained against the City of Chicago.
Abstractly stated, this case concerns a matter of statutory construction. So stated, the problem before the Court is denuded of illuminating concreteness and thereby of its far-reaching significance for our federal system. Again abstractly stated, this matter of statutory construction is one upon which the Court has already passed. But it has done so under circumstances and in settings that negative those considerations of social policy upon which the doctrine…
2Cases cited175 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.