Legal Opinion
In Re White
California Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1925No. Docket No. Crim. 2707PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The petitioner herein seeks his release on habeas corpus after judgment of conviction rendered in the recorder’s court of the town of Atherton, county of San Mateo, upon a charge of misdemeanor, to wit, violation of Ordinance 23 of said town.
Succinctly stated, the undisputed facts of the case, shown by the return to the writ and the petition for the writ, employed as a traverse, and the stipulations of the respective parties to the proceedings, are these:
Said Ordinance 23 is a zoning ordinance which divides the town of Atherton into two zones designated as “The residence district” and “The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by33 opinions
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re PortnoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Pacific Palisades Ass'n v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Brougher v. Board of Public Works of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.