Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Colombe

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1922No. File No. 4908Published

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

This action is brought to have the defendants Colombe declared trustees of certain lands in Charles Mix county for the 'benefit of plaintiff. The facts so far as material are: Christopher Colombe, husband of Emma Colombe, about March, 1919, entered into an oral agreement with plaintiff by which defendant C. Colombe agreed, for the payment to him of a reasonable commission, to act as plaintiff’s agent in the purchase of lands involved as soon as a patent in fee was received at the Indian agency at Greenwood. This land had been allotted to one Daniel Charging Whirlwind, a Yankton Sioux Indian.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rose v. HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Boswell & Rose v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  4. Snyder v. WolfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Onson v. CownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API