Legal Opinion

Black v. Creston Auto Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 5, 1938No. 44422PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSager, C. J.

— Without going into the record at length, we find it supports the conclusion that claimant suffered injuries from the careless or inadvertent use of dangerous-tetra-ethyl gasoline while working for the defendant in the course of its business. Through some oversight, neglect, or mistake in providing this type of gasoline to be used, there were released gases of some sort or other which resulted in lead poisoning. The record further supports the view that on the substitution of white or plain gasoline for use in the torch poisonous gases and fumes were no longer emitted.

We find it unnecessary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Almquist v. Shenandoah Nurseries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Miller v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. McKeever Custom Cabinets v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. American Maize Products Co. v. NichiporchikIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Davis v. BjorensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API