Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Adjustment Serv. Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 2000No. 1999-0664, 1999-0666, & 1999-1007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 385.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. ADJUSTMENT SERVICE CORPORATION, D.B.A. CINCINNATI CREDIT COUNSELING. CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. FUQUA. CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. CLAPP & AFFILIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Adjustment Serv. Corp.,
2000-Ohio-204.] Unauthorized practice of law—Validity of subpoenas issued by the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law of the Supreme Court—Respondents’ motions to quash subpoenas granted. (Nos. 98-664, 98-666 and 99-1007—Submitted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Zakany v. ZakanyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Clapp & Affliliates Fin. Serv., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Cleveland v. Amazing Tickets, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018