Legal Opinion
Maher Terminals, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Vincent Riggio
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 29, 2003No. 01-3343PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
The sole question in this petition for review of the order of the United States Department of Labor, Benefits Review Board (the “Board”) is whether the claimant, Vincent Riggio, is a covered maritime employee under the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. (the “Act”). Riggio was employed by petitioner Maher Terminals, Inc. (“Maher”) as both checker, a covered position, and delivery clerk, a job that is not covered by the Act. 1 Although Maher stipulated at oral argument that Riggio split his time evenly between these…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. SchwalbSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Boudloche v. Howard Trucking Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Maher Terminals, Inc. v. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Benefits Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- C & C Marine Maintenance Co. v. BellowsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- C&C Marine v. Director OWCPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Martin v. MATT CANESTRALE CONTRACTING, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Moffit v. Metro Machine of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012