Legal Opinion
Boudloche v. Howard Trucking Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 19, 1980No. 80-3045PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES CLARK, Circuit Judge:
A majority of the Benefits Review Board asserts thatj Congress did not intend for the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) to cover employees whose maritime employment was insubstantial. Because the Supreme Court has held Congress intended to cover workers when at least some part of their duties involved such employment, we reverse and remand.
*1347The facts as found by the Board are as follows. The claimant, Edgar J. Boudloche, was employed by Howard Trucking Company, Inc., (Howard) as a truck driver. Howard was engaged in the business of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
3Cited by24 opinions
- William Pippen, Jr. v. Shell Oil Company and Inland Well Service, Inc., Third-Party v. Superior Electric Wireline Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Hullinghorst Industries, Inc. v. David E. Carroll, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- COASTAL PRODUCTION SERVICES INC. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Kathleen Russo, Wife Of/and Herbert L. Gay v. Barge 266 and Brown & Root U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Ruth Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc. And Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.