Moffit v. Metro Machine of Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Alvin Moffit petitions for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board (“BRB”). Because we conclude that the BRB’s decision affirming the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) was supported by substantial evidence and accorded with the law, the petition will be denied.
I
Petitioner filed a claim under the Long-shore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA” or “Act”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950, alleging that in October, 2000, he sustained work-related injuries to his wrist, and, in a separate incident, to his shoulder, spine, and back. He returned to work after each…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Evon HUDSON, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- O'KEEFFE v. Aerojet-General Shipyards, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Metropolitan Stevedore Co. v. RamboSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- McCabe v. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.