State v. Davis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
A few simple observations will make clear the right of the State to docket and dismiss the attempted appeal in this case.
1. In the first place, it should be remembered that the object of a trial is to ascertain the truth and to do justly. Both parties are privileged *320to present their evidence at the hearing. This is their opportunity to make the truth appear, and, if not seized, it may be lost. Every litigant is entitled, as a matter of right, to one trial, but not necessarily to two. Pico v. Cohn, 91 Cal., 129, 13 L. R. A., 336.
However, to make sure that no man shall be deprived of his life,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Henry v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Velez v. Dick Keffer Pontiac GMC Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.