Legal Opinion

State v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 2013No. 48PA11-2PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

After defendant was convicted of drug possession offenses, his father stated outside of court that the contraband belonged to him. The trial court concluded this statement was newly discovered evidence under N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(c) and granted defendant a new trial. Because the information implicating the father was available to defendant before his conviction, the statement was not newly discovered evidence under N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(c). Accordingly, we reverse the opinion of the Court of Appeals affirming the trial court’s decision to award defendant a new trial.

On 6 February…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. In re A.F.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. In Re Estate of SkinnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Cmty. Success Initiative v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2023
  5. Dunhill HoldingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API