Legal Opinion
State v. Watkins
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 18, 2006No. 56507-9-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
148 P.3d 1112 (2006)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Jermaine Devon WATKINS, Appellant.
No. 56507-9-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
December 18, 2006.
Christopher Gibson, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, Valerie Marushige, Attorney at Law, Des Moines, Counsel for Appellants.
Scott Frederick Leist, King County Prosecuting Atty Office, Seattle, Counsel for Respondents.
PUBLISHED IN PART
COX, J.
¶ 1 Jury instructions must more than adequately convey the law. They must make the relevant legal standard "manifestly apparent to the average juror."[1] Here, the unanimity instruction given…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. BorsheimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. BorsheimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Tommy Lee Crow, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.