State v. Carson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
¶1 — David Carson appeals his conviction on three counts of child molestation in the first degree. He argues on appeal that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney objected to a Petrich1 instruction proposed by the State. A defendant must overcome a heavy burden in order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance; he must demonstrate that his attorney’s performance was professionally deficient and that he suffered prejudice as a result. Carson satisfies neither prong of this standard.
¶2 Defense counsel reasonably concluded that the proposed instruction’s…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- King v. CommonwealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- In re Pers. Restraint of KnightWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. WiebeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- In re Pers. Restraint of KnightWashington Supreme Court · 2023
- In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Jose Manual QuinteroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.