Legal Opinion

State v. Berg

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 29, 2008No. 60729-4-IPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

¶1 Edward Berg appeals his convictions for third degree rape of a child and third degree child moles*927tation. He contends that (1) the trial court’s instructions subjected him to double jeopardy by allowing the jury to find him guilty of two counts of molestation based on a single act, (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel by his attorney’s failure to object to a detective’s testimony about other sex abuse investigations, (3) his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum, and (4) the sentencing condition restricting contact with his biological daughter violated his fundamental right…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Eduardo Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. MutchWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. LandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Steven Lodis & Deborah Lodis v. Corbis Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API