Legal Opinion

Steil v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 8, 1928No. 18696PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

The defendant in error, as plaintiff in the county court, sought to surcharge the defendant, his former guardian, with the sum of $397.16, and interest, alleged to have been illegally expended. The judgment of the county court was for defendant. On appeal to the district court, judgment was rendered for plaintiff and against defendant surcharging him as guardian with the sum of $397.16, and interest from September 3, 1912, in the total sum of $742.55, and costs. From the judgment of the district court, this appeal is perfected.

Appellee denies jurisdiction -of this court under the contention…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Winona Oil Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Anthony Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Ozark Oil Co. v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berryhill v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF BERRYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API