State v. Stokes

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Michael Dale Stokes appeals a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving while under the influence of alcohol in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (Supp.1983). Stokes contends that (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction; (2) he was denied a fair trial because the prosecutor asked objectionable questions and made prejudicial statements; and (3) the trial court erred in admitting evidence without a proper foundation. We affirm the conviction.

FACTS

Michael Stokes cut and hauled wood for three days prior to this incident, making several trips from Hibbing,…