Legal Opinion
Karl Roberts v. District No. 9
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 6, 1997No. 96-2432, 96-2437, 96-2440 and 96-3445PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Unidynamics Corporation, which does business as Crane National Vendors (Crane), and District No. 9 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (the union), appeal from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of Karl Roberts. Roberts’ suit is based on his claim that Crane and the union regarded him as carrying the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or having Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) and discriminated against him because of that perception. Roberts cross-appeals on several issues. We reverse the judgment and dismiss the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Donald C. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- C. Thomas RYTHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KARE 11, an NBC Affiliate; Gannett Co., Inc., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Hubert Wooten v. Farmland FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Laurina Price v. S-B Power Tool, Also Known as Skil Corporation, a Division of Emerson Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Annie Miners v. Cargill Communications, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.