Legal Opinion · Dissent

Olesen v. Town (City) of Hurley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2004No. NonePublished

1Dissent

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice,

(dissenting)..

[¶ 26.] I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the lower court on Issue 2. I would hold the trial court erred when it granted partial summary judgment to 01-esens, holding City’s operation of food service at the municipal bar was an ultra vires act.

[¶27.] An express grant of authority from the legislature “includes those incidental or implied powers that are necessary to enable a municipality to perform the function authorized.” City of Rapid City v. Rensch, 77 S.D. 242, 246, 90 N.W.2d 380, 383 (1958) (citation omitted). A municipality is vested with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ericksen v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Rapid City v. RenschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. City of Marion v. SchoenwaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Robbins v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City of Vermillion v. HugenerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API