Greathouse v. Babcock and Wilcox Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONTIE, District Judge.
This matter was tried before the Court on plaintiff’s allegations that the defendant company violated his rights under Section 9 of the Military Selective Sesrvice Act of 1967 as amended, Title 50, U.S.C.App. § 459(c)(1) by dismissing him without cause within one year after his return from serving in the Armed Services. In his post trial brief, plaintiff urges the Court to exercise its prerogative under Rule 15(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to deem the complaint amended to show a cause of action under Title 50, U.S.C. App. §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Czaplicki v. the Hoegh SilvercloudSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Thomas Henry Carter v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Shell v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Trusteed Funds, Inc. v. DaceyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- John H. Stevens v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Lehner v. Crane Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bishop v. Keystone Area Education Agency Number 1Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Armstrong v. BakerDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1975
- Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.