Legal Opinion
In Re Slaughter
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided October 12, 1935No. 3551PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
The bankrupt filed an application for relief under the old Frazier-Lemke Act in 1934. A conciliation was not agreed upon, and the bankrupt then sought benefits under subsection (s) "of that amendment (Bankr. Act § 75 (s), as added by Act June 28, 1934, 48 Stat. 1289).
By agreement of all the concerned parties, the bankrupt was permitted to continue in possession of and to work his farm. Because of the imminence of a decision of unconstitutionality, the case was held in abeyance, before the referee, for three months, and, when the act was de clared void, the farmer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re FullagarDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1934
- Midwest Mutual Insurance v. De HoetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- In Re SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
- In Re SchoenleberDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1936
- In Re TschoepeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1936
- In Re DavisDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.