Legal Opinion

Berzin v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1932No. Docket No. 8200PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J., pro tem.

This is a proceeding to review an award made by the Industrial Accident Commission in favor of the petitioner, H. Berzin, but which he contends furnishes insufficient compensation for the injury suffered.

From February, 1927, to July 16, 1930, Berzin was employed by the Pacific Electric Manufacturing Corporation as a grinder, whose work consisted of grinding brass, copper, iron and steel castings on an emery-wheel. In such grinding operations dust is created and, unless drawn off by mechanical devices, beclouds the atmosphere. Moreover, at times sparks fly from the metals…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Singlaub v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. O'Hare v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Witt's Dairy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Skip Fordyce, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API