Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cox, J., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2016No. 707 CAPPublishedCited by 200 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUSTICE DONOHUE

In his second collateral capital appeal, Jermont Cox (“Cox”) challenges the denial of his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546 (“PCRA”). 1 Cox contends that newly-discovered facts entitle him to a new trial. Following our thorough review, we agree with the PCRA court’s determination that Cox’s petition is untimely and therefore affirm its order.

This Court described the facts underlying Cox’s conviction at length in conjunction with his direct appeal. See Commonwealth v. Cox. 556 Pa. 368, 728 A.2d 923, 926-29 (1999). For the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by200 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Burton, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. Small, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. Staton, A., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. SmallwoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API