Legal Opinion

Gotz v. Universal Products Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 4, 1939No. 6818PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

We are in complete accord with the opinion of the learned district court judge dealing with the technical aspects of the case below, Gotz v. Universal Products Co., D.C., 22 F.Supp. 215. The art is that of bearings, the name given to the supports of a rotating shaft. The shaft imposes a load on each of the bearings supporting it, and it is turned against the frictional resistances caused by this loading. The rotation of the shaft against the frictional resistances in the bearings caused by the loading absorbs energy from the prime mover and this energy is converted into…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gotz v. Universal Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gotz v. Universal Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  2. Ellis-Foster Co. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API