Legal Opinion
Aerocrine AB v. Apieron Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 30, 2010No. Civ. No. 08-787-LPSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY MATTERS
LEONARD P. STARK, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiffs in this patent infringement action are Aeroerine AB and Aerocrine Inc. (collectively “Aeroerine”). Now pending before the Court are two discovery motions filed by Defendant Apieron Inc. (“Apieron”). They are Apieron’s Motion to Compel Aer-ocrine to Make Inventors Available for Testimony and Produce its Accused Device (“Motion to Compel”) (D.I. 95) and Apieron’s Motion for the Issuance of Letters of Request for International Judicial Assistance Pursuant to the Hague Convention of March 18, 1970…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Deere & Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. International Harvester Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- South Seas Catamaran, Inc. v. Motor Vessel "Leeway"District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Murata Manufacturing Co. v. Bel Fuse, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ethypharm S.A. France v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Bohnel v. Jetblue Airways CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Hill v. Jetblue Airways CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Maugain v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Pagan v. DentDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.