Legal Opinion

Jones v. Callahan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1955No. 31PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

David A. Jones died testate. His Will disposed of all assets constituting his estate. Our primary inquiry is to ascertain the testator’s intent. Trust Co. v. Miller, 223 N.C. 1, 25 S.E. 2d 177. With this in mind, we consider each item in controversy.

PlaiNtiff’s Appeal.

1. Ford car. The agreed case states simply that the testator “had one 1950 two-door secondhand Ford automobile.” Nothing else appearing, the Ford car is not comprehended in the bequest to the widow in Item II of “all of my household and kitchen furniture, jewelry, clothing and other articles of personal property used in and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Broadnax v. . BroadnaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Ervin v. . Conn and Bank v. . FredericksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Chemical Co. v. . WalstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Ervin v. ConnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Tanner v. ErvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Wright v. McMullanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. In Re Peterson EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
  5. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WilderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API