Chemical Co. v. . Walston

Controversy without action. The essential facts agreed are as follows:

1. Corbett Moore was a partnership composed of R. L. Corbett and W. M. Moore, and prior to 21 March, 1923, did a mercantile business in Macclesfield, N.C.

2. W. M. Moore, a member of said firm, died on 21 March, 1923, and L. E. Walston duly qualified as administrator of his estate.

3. After the death of W. M. Moore, J. S. Howard and R. L. Corbett were appointed receivers of the partnership assets of Corbett Moore, and they are now duly administering same under orders of court.

4. The partnership firm of Corbett Moore is…