Thomas v. Southeast Alabama Sickle Cell Ass'n
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The issues presented in this case are whether the trial court committed reversible error by (1) allowing the plaintiff’s attorney to withdraw from the prosecution of the case on the day of trial and (2) subsequently refusing to grant the plaintiff a continuance.
In September 1989, Margaret Brown, attorney for the plaintiff, Sarah Ward Thomas, filed a motion to withdraw, four days before the trial date, stating that “the attorney and client, Sarah Thomas, have come to a point where the two can no longer work together congenially.” The motion further stated that the problems had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- LW Johnson & Assoc., Inc. v. RIVERS CONST. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Thomas v. KellettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Howard v. McCarsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hale v. Larry Latham Auctioneers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Jacobs v. JacobsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Eaton v. EatonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- Ex Parte JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.