Legal Opinion
Howard v. McCarson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 10, 1926No. 6 Div. 302PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
“When an attorney accepts a retainer to conduct a legal proceeding, he enters into an entire contract to conduct the proceedings to a conclusion, and he may not abandon his relation without justifiable cause, or the consent of his client. If he does so, he forfeits all right to compensation, even for services already rendered, and renders himself liable to an action for damages resulting from hrs wrongful withdrawal and consequent neglect of the case; he may not abandon a cause at a critical stage, leaving his client helpless in the emergency.” 6 Corp. Jur. 673, 674, § 186.
Assuming, without…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Jones v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- Earl Edward Gandy v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Evans v. SwaimSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Greer v. O'DellDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
- Thomas v. Southeast Alabama Sickle Cell Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.