Legal Opinion
Clement v. Clement
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1982No. Civ. 10180PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
When Mary Clement remarried after she and Duane were divorced, the trial court, upon a motion by Duane, amended the judgment by eliminating Duane’s obligation to pay Mary alimony of $500 per month. Mary appealed from the amended judgment, contending that alimony, in this ease, was a part of a property settlement agreement and, therefore, could not be modified by the court, pursuant to § 14-05-24, NDCC. We do not agree. The amended judgment is affirmed.
At least since 1973 this court has been saying that when a motion necessitates the resolution of conflicting evidence, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nastrom v. NastromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Stee v. "L" Monte Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Ellendale Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'n v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Seablom v. SeablomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Roen v. RoenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Rothberg v. RothbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. ConwayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Cook v. CookNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.