Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Wilkins

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 20, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Judge.

Plaintiff has brought this action to recover for dog bite sustained when plaintiff entered an Atlantic Richfield Service Station in Wilmington. He has sued the operator of the service station, the attendant on duty and Atlantic Richfield Company [Arco]. Arco has moved for summary judgment.

The service station was owned by Arco and leased to the defendant Thomas Wilkins [Wilkins] who operated the service station. The lease provided that “Lessee shall exercise and be responsible for exclusive control of the leased premises”. Plaintiff cites certain clauses of the lease by which it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Frear v. Manchester Traction, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. DecellMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Manning v. Leavitt Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  5. Grochowski v. StewartSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Craig v. A.A.R. Realty Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. Gilbert v. ChristiansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Bajwa v. Millcreek Shopping Center LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API