Legal Opinion
Manning v. Leavitt Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 4, 1939No. 3047PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
The plaintiff’s declaration alleged that the defendant, on March 21, 1935, owned, operated and maintained a beauty parlor in Manchester known as “Leavitt’s Beauty Salon”; that on that day the plaintiff went to the salon and asked for and received a treatment for her hair known as permanent waving; that the defendant, through its agents and servants, gave the treatment in such a negligent manner that the plaintiff’s hair was burned and fell off; that in consequence she has suffered great mental anguish and deep mortification because of her disfigurement. The evidence tended to prove, besides…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Tulsa Entertainment Co. v. GreenleesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Bernier v. Woodstock Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Wilson v. Norumbega Park Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Adelphia Hotel Co. v. Providence Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sargent v. RossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Goodman v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Weiss v. WassermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
- Ward v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
- Lynch v. L. B. Sprague, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.