Legal Opinion
Dome Patent L.P. v. Permeable Technologies, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 27, 1999No. 98-CV-6247LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Dome Patent L.P. (“Dome”), commenced this patent infringement action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on December 30, 1997. On May 18, 1998, District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. of the Eastern District of California signed an Order transferring the case to this district pursuant to 28 U. S.C. § 1404(a).
Defendant Polymer Technology (“Polymer”) has moved to dismiss the complaint under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In addition, prior to the transfer of this action, Polymer…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- George Hadges, William M. Kunstler v. Yonkers Racing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment GroupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Thomas Dodson v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General for the U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Safe-Strap Co., Inc. v. Koala Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Bruce James v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- SMG v. Metropolitan Entertainment Consultants, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021