McCauley v. Arkansas Rice Growers' Cooperative Ass'n
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). At the outset, it may be stated that the validity of contracts under our Cooperative Marketing Act was sustained in the Arkansas Cotton Growers’ Cooperative Association v. Brown, 168 Ark. 504, 270 S. W. 946, and it was held that equity has jurisdiction to grant relief where legal remedies are inadequate. In addition to the authorities cited in the opinion and by the reporter in a footnote, we refer to the case-notes in 25 A. L. R. 1113 and 33 A. L. R. 247, for a full discussion and review of the decisions of the various courts of the different States on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Emigrant Co. v. County of AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Brown v. Staple Cotton Co-operative Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
- Arlington Hotel Co. v. RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Pratt v. McCoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Temple v. LawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bogardus v. Santa Ana Walnut Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Ozona Citrus Growers' Association v. McLeanSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Arkansas Cotton Growers' Cooperative Ass'n v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Driver v. J. T. Fargason Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Furze v. Lake Region Packing Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.