Legal Opinion

Driver v. J. T. Fargason Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The principal question raised by the appeal involves the right to redeem what is called the Driver home place from the mortgage foreclosure decree, and that question is settled by the provisions of the deed of trust. As will He seen from our statement of facts, the deed of trust contains an express provision that the home place of 320 acres shall not be sold until all the other property is exhausted, and that the mortgagor shall have one year from the date of sale to redeem said 320 acres- known as the home place, upon which he resides. This provision…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cox v. RatcliffeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. KirchoffIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Oertel v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Bradley v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Temple v. LawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. Warmack v. ZinggSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API