Legal Opinion
Diehl v. Barnhart
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 7, 2005No. Civ.A. 03-4835PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Ronald Diehl, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying Plaintiffs claim for Disability Insurance Benefits. Before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Court grant Defendant’s motion ’ and deny Plaintiffs motion, and Plaintiffs objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
Plaintiff has raised a multitude of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jones v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Gross v. McMahonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- O'Leary v. New Hampshire Boring, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Campbell v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- BELL v. KIJAKAZIDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.