Legal Opinion

State v. Holly Sugar Corporation

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1941No. 2185PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Chief Justice.

This action arose in connection with the administration by the State Board of Equalization of the Selective Sales Tax Act of 1937, (Laws of Wyoming, 1937, Chapter 102.) The defendants declined to pay certain amounts claimed by said Board to be due the State of Wyoming under said Act, and this action was brought by the commonwealth to recover these amounts, together with accrued penalties, interest and costs. The plaintiff below, appellant here, will usually be referred to hereinafter as “the State” or the “plaintiff”. The two respondents, defendants below, Holly Sugar…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edwards v. County of Lewis & ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. City of Metropolis v. GibbonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State v. Capital Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State Board of Equalization v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. ChadbourneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Board of Equalization v. Cheyenne Newspapers, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pacificorp, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
  4. Jager v. GrommeshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. McCaw Keating v. Tax Com'r FaseHawaii Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API