Legal Opinion

Stapleton v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1903No. Docket No. 63PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by William J. Stapleton against the Grand Trunk Railway Company for tbe value of goods destroyed by fire in defendant’s freigbtbouse. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action to recover for the value of goods destroyed in a fire which burned the freighthouse of the defendant at Mt. Clemens, on Monday, the 30th day of April, 1900, at 3 o’clock in the afternoon. The plaintiff is the surviving partner of George Norris & Co., of Detroit, manufacturers and dealers in bottled drinks. This concern had been doing business in Mt. Clemens for *188some 20 years, and in the course of business, on the 27th day of April, 1900, had shipped a quantity of goods to their agent, Patrick Bogue, at Mt. Clemens. A part of these goods reached there on Friday, April 27th,-…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hasse v. American Express Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Meloche v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Georgia, F. & A. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Behrman v. A.C.L.R. R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  4. Barber v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Curtis Tire & Rubber Co. v. Goodrich Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API