Hasse v. American Express Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Case made from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant assigns error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
June 8, 1891, plaintiffs, who are clothiers in the city of Dotroit, delivered a parcel of clothing to the defendant for carriage to Marquette, Mich., addressed to one McMillan, marked “O. 0. D. $30.00.” On June 10 they delivered another parcel, addressed to one ’WCick, Marquette, “ 0. O. D. $35.00.” June 16 they delivered another package, addressed to one Hart, Marquette, “ O. O. D. $62.00.” Bach of these packages reached Marquette on the day following its receipt by the defendant. Its agent at Marquette, immediately on receipt of the first two packages, took them to the residences of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marshall v. WellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Adams Express Co. v. DarnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Weed v. . BarneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hutchinson v. United States Express Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
- Stapleton v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Hoit v. McIntireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- American Railway Express Co. v. RhodyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
- Fowler v. Seaboard Airline Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914