Myers v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City (Cor-tee, J.). The motion in, arrest of judgement was as follows.: “The defendants move that judgment be arrested for the following reasons: “1. Because the verdict of the jury is against the evidence. “2. Because the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. “3. Because the court erred in its rulings. “4. Because of newly discovered evidence, and for other reasons to be assigned.”
1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.
Andrew Bead Myers and Herbert Myersi were convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore City of having and re ceiving an automobile knowing tlie1 same1 to have been feloniously stolen, and they were both sentenced to be imprisoned in the Maryland penitentiary for ten years. From that judgment this: appeal was taken.
The specific crime with which the appellants were charged was the larceny and subsequent disposal of an automobile belonging to Samuel W. Mays of New York, and the facts of the case may be briefly stated. The appellants are: brothers and had been connected with the operation,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bloomer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Beard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- State v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Berger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Coblentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.