Legal Opinion
Han Tak Lee v. Glunt
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 27, 2012No. 10-4133PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
The brief on behalf of Petitioner-Appellant Han Tak Lee has listed the following statement of issues:
1. Is petitioner-appellant Han Tak Lee incarcerated for a crime of which newly discovered scientific evidence persuasively shows he is probably innocent, in violation of his due process rights?
a. Is an actual innocence claim based upon newly discovered evidence cognizable in a federal habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254?
b. Does AEDPA’s deferential standard of review apply to the Pennsylvania Superior court’s decision in this case?
2.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cone v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Nicole Harris v. Sheryl ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Sistrunk v. RozumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Taibu Grant v. Melvin LockettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Joseph Wallace v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- McBride v. Superintendent, Sci HoutzdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.